On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 04:44, Brian T. Schellenberger wrote: > > First, thank you very much for responding! > > On Friday 09 August 2002 06:32 pm, Michel D�nzer wrote: > | On Wed, 2002-08-07 at 05:10, Brian T. Schellenberger wrote: > | > I've always had occaisonal problems with refreshes not properly taking > | > place, but since I've installed XFree86 4.2, it has gotten much worse. > | > > | > If I invoke "xv", for example, on multiple pictures, then when I go to > | > the next picture it will very frequntly fail to properly refresh the > | > picture. For example, if the first picture is 200x200 and the second is > | > 400x200, then it will typically be the case that once I hit the spacebar, > | > I see the original picture on the left half of the xv window and the > | > right half of the new picture on the right half. > | > > | > The other program where I notice this frequently is vncviewer. It has > | > always had some noticable refresh problems, but they seem to be markedly > | > worse now. > : > | I assume Option "NoAccel" fixes the refresh problems? If so, try playing > | with the "XaaNo..." options described in the XF86Config-4 manpage to > | isolate an offending acceleration function. I'd guess the ones related > | to Pixmaps would be a good start. > > This is a very logical assumption. Unfortunately, it's not true. > > If I try setting NoAccel, the problem still occurs; it's not even improved > (that I can tell) by setting the option.
Well, the CPU draws every single pixel without acceleration, so this sounds like a problem with the apps (unlikely I think), the hardware or maybe some kind of PCI configuration? -- Earthling Michel D�nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
