On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, David D. Hagood wrote: >Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 09:03:20 -0500 >From: David D. Hagood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed >Subject: Re: Floating point exception in Radeon driver at 1400x1050 > >Mike A. Harris wrote: > >>>According to earlier Xpert posts, it also happens with 1600x1200. >> >> >> Hmm. I'm using 1600x1200 on my one machine all the time.. > >It seems to be related to the available monitor scan rates - if I >configure my monitor for a maximum horizontal scan rate of 85 kHz, I get >the fault, but if I configure it for 80 kHz, I don't. > >Perhaps there is a numeric overflow somewhere?
Hmm, this info should be very useful in debugging.. Thanks. Nobody will ever need more than 640 kB RAM. (Bill Gates, 1983) Windows 98 requires 16 MB RAM. (Bill Gates, 1999) Logical conclusion: Nobody will ever need Windows 98. _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
