On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 08:39:10AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:41:33PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > If one knew the time until vblank, one could simply wait that time, > > > and then do a xsync. > > > > > > It could really be that simple. > > > > You can't sleep with that level of precision. > > That depends entirely on which OS and which kernel.
Yup. nanosleep(). Any OS that implements POSIX.1003-2001 real-time extensions should do, modulo implementation quality. The latency can be measured, too, and code written that compensates for it. Kurt -- "Matrimony isn't a word, it's a sentence." _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
