[I sent this message yesterday but it hasn't appeared on the mailing list and I haven't received any notice about it being held or anything. Sorry if the other eventually shows up and this is a duplicate]
Marc Aurele La France <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The log shows you are only using the Matrox adapter. So, a few questions > arise: > > - Do you see the same problems using the Mach64 GT? Hm, so now I can't reproduce the mouse hotpoint out of sync problem on the Matrox either. I think I was being fooled by a window manager that was compressing mouse movements and sometimes didn't end up in the correct place. Using the gimp to locate the hot point the hot point always seems to be in sync. The panning is still jerky at 4 pixels per pan, that's still annoying. But it's not a correctness issue I guess. Any chance of going back to the X 3 method of panning that allowed arbitrary offsets? The displaced pixels showing up at the right edge of the screen is still there though. It only happens on the Matrox card, not the ATI. Some more data: it seems to happen when the screen is panned to any offset congruent to 4 mod 64. For example, when panned to column 4 (with the first column being 0) the pixels starting at column 128-131 appear in the rightmost four columns of the screen. When panned to 68 columns 192-195 appear in the rightmost column. This is with the virtual frame buffer at 1600x1200 and the actual screen resolution set to 640x480. The mouse pointer does show up on the duplicated pixels at the right edge when it passes through those four pixels in the middle. -- greg _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
