En/na [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha escrit:

should/could be to deal with the spam problem?  Or perhaps the sending
IP is a "subscriber" IP of some sort.  They should be using their ISP
assigned mail exchanger.
Just because some antispam nazi says so?
No thank you, I'm perfectly capable to manage my mail server on my "subscriber" IP, for no other reasons that a) I can and b) I will give myself a much better mail service than my ISP and c) I don't have to explain my reasons, an IP is an IP is an IP.
Spammers are rendering email less useful (by decreasing the signal to noise ratio and wasting bandwith), MAPS & friends are rendering email less useful (by imposing arbitrary restrictions and blocking legitimate email), so Spammers and MAPS & friends are in the same boat in my book.

--
Luca Olivetti
Note.- This message reached you today, it may not tomorrow if you
are using MAPS services. They arbitrarily include in their lists
IP addresses not related in any way to spam, and in so doing are
disrupting Internet connectivity. Please stop supporting them.
See http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/05/21/1944247

Attachment: msg11189/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to