On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Warren Turkal wrote: > On Tuesday 10 December 2002 03:24 pm, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > > After going through that exercise, perhaps, you will have gained a greater > > appreciation for what portability really means.
> Thank you for the explanation. In these places that warnings are produced, > should the code call for a CARD32 instead of calling for an unsigned long or > something like that? Something like that. Keep in mind though, that this code currently compiles on both 32-bit and 64-bit without any warnings related to long/int or signedness. There are also printf format strings to contend with. I attach the little bit I have on this matter (which includes your patch). Marc. +----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | Marc Aurele La France | work: 1-780-492-9310 | | Computing and Network Services | fax: 1-780-492-1729 | | 352 General Services Building | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | University of Alberta +-----------------------------------+ | Edmonton, Alberta | | | T6G 2H1 | Standard disclaimers apply | | CANADA | | +----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ XFree86 Core Team member. ATI driver and X server internals.
C99.diff.gz
Description: Binary data
