On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 10:06:26PM +0000, John Gay wrote: > On Mon 23 Dec 2002 22:10, you wrote: > > ---------------------- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original > > message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar > > unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more > > details. [snip] > I don't understand what all this means. Maybe someone can explain it so I can > avoid being ID'd as a spammer in the future?
> SPAM: SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 (0.6 points) BODY: Spam phrases score is 00 to 01 Your message matched some phrase that SpamAssassin thinks is spammish. Don't worry about this one too much. > SPAM: MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_2 (0.5 points) 'Message-Id' was added by a relay Your mail software is broken; you are sending messages without Message-ID headers. (It got to xfree86.org before anyone thought to add a message-id. Mail is never supposed to leave its source machine (or at worst, source network) without a Message-ID.) > SPAM: RCVD_IN_MULTIHOP_DSBL (0.8 points) RBL: Received via a relay in >multihop.dsbl.org > SPAM: [RBL check: found 17.118.134.159.multihop.dsbl.org] > SPAM: RCVD_IN_RFCI (2.3 points) RBL: Received via a relay in >ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org SPAM: > [RBL check: found 17.118.134.159.ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org., type: 127.0.0.6] > SPAM: RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL (0.8 points) RBL: Received via a relay in >unconfirmed.dsbl.org > SPAM: [RBL check: found 17.118.134.159.unconfirmed.dsbl.org] Your mail provider is on several blacklists. The RFC-Ignorant one is the most severe, because you have to be *really* stupid to run an ISP in such a fashion as to meet the rfc-ignorant criteria. I would suggest that you find a new ISP; eircom really does suck (I get as much spam from them as I do from any of the major US ISPs). HTH -andy _______________________________________________ Xpert mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
