Hi there all

I am also having problems with the hbdb potential. I have a protein in 
complex with AMP.
The PSF is like this:

       1 P    1    ALA  N    NH3   -0.100000       14.0070           0
       2 P    1    ALA  HT1  HC     0.260000       1.00800           0
       3 P    1    ALA  HT2  HC     0.260000       1.00800           0
       4 P    1    ALA  HT3  HC     0.260000       1.00800           0
.......
    3926 P    255  LEU  OT2  OC    -0.570000       15.9990           0
    3927 A    300  ATP  PG   PG      1.20000       30.9740           0
    3928 A    300  ATP  O1G  O1G   -0.400000       15.9994           0
    3929 A    300  ATP  O2G  O2G   -0.400000       15.9994           0

And when I run the test minimisation script modified for my setup. 
Although the hbdb is called it doesn't calculate the H-bonds using the 
free format and the hbdb energy is 0. I also tried   segm = P and 
nothing either.

Any help would be much appreciated. I'm sure its something simple....

Furthermore, has anybody got it working in the fixed Hbond list mode?

Thanks
James
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
evaluate ($PARAMETERS2    = "ade.param")
evaluate ($PARAMETERS    = 
"/usr/local/xplor215/xplor-nih-2.15.0/toppar/parallhdg_new.pro")
evaluate ($STRUCTURE     = "LOWESTmin_ATP300.psf"       )
evaluate ($TEMPLATE      = "mda2_3.pdb"    )  

param
   @TOPPAR:parallhdg_new.pro
   @$PARAMETERS2
end

structure
@$STRUCTURE
end

coor @$TEMPLATE
end

!hb database must be read in after psf file

hbdb
 kdir = 0.8   !force constant for directional term
 klin = 0.08   !force constant for linear term (ca. Nico's hbda)
 nseg = 2 ! number of segments that hbdb term is active on
 nmin = 1     !range of residues (1st)
 nmax = 255     !range of residues (last)
 ohcut   =  2.60  !cut-off for detection of h-bonds
 coh1cut = 100.0  !cut-off for c-o-h angle in 3-10 helix
 coh2cut = 100.0  !cut-off for c-o-h angle for everything else
 ohncut  = 100.0  !cut-off for o-h-n angle
 updfrq = 10     !update frequency usually 1000
 prnfrq = 10     !print frequency usually 1000
freemode  = 1     !mode= 1 free search
fixedmode = 0     !if you want a fixed list, set fixedmode=1, and freemode=0
 mfdir = 0 ! flag that drives HB's to the minimum of the directional 
potential
 mflin = 0 ! flag that drives HB's to the minimum of the linearity potential
 kmfd = 10.0 ! corresp force const
 kmfl = 10.0 ! corresp force const
 renf = 2.30 ! forces all found HB's below 2.3 A
 kenf = 30.0 ! corresponding force const
 @HBDB:hbdb_files.inp
end

flags exclude * include bonds angles impr hbdb end
mini powell nstep=1000 end
stop
-----------------------------------------



-- 
James Swarbrick PhD
Lecturer in Medicinal Chemistry
Victorian College of Pharmacy
381 Royal Parade
Parkville
Melbourne
Australia 3052
Tel: ++ 03 99039543





Matthias Buck wrote:

> Dear Charles,
>
> I have been trying to use the HBDB in presence of explicit waters
> (xplor scripting).
> However there are some problems with the assignment/NBonded update
> -
> although I am using different segment names for protein and water
> together with nmin, nmax and nseg (the last just seen in hbdb.inp test
> example) together with segm (just seen under HBDB help),
> I do not believe xplor does a proper selection of the segment.
>
> firstly, there seems to be a limit on the number of residues / atoms: -
> atoms beyond 4729 are not found {and on an energy update
> the HBDB table is not filled}
> -- I don't know what is special about that number, but since the 
> complaint
> is about a water which is not in the segment selected, I do not believe
> the selection works.
>
> if I reduce the number of waters in the simulation to get below this
> number, xplor spends a good 2hrs+ on a reasonably fast pc on the 
> energy update
> that is meant to give a hbond table - clearly this is not correct.
>
> if I do the HBDB command/assignment before loading in the waters, it does
> much better, now actually identifying the Hbonds and calculating the 
> energy,
> but it no longer sees Hbonds in energy updates after waters are added 
> (i.e. the psf
> has been modified).
>
> in conclusion I wonder whether there is a bug in the selection HBDB 
> passes
> on when there are multiple segments. {has this been tested?}
>
> with best regards,
>
> Matthias
>
> Matthias Buck
> Assistant Professor
> Physiology & Biophysics Department
> Case Western Reserve Univ.
> Medical School, E646
> 2109 Adelbert Road
> Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
>
> fax      216-368-1693
> phone 216-368-8651
>
> e-mail [email protected]
> http://mbalster.cwru.edu/
> _______________________________________________
> Xplor-nih mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://dcb.cit.nih.gov/mailman/listinfo/xplor-nih
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to