Dear Charles,
Thanks for your advice.
My starting structures dose not give a good fit to RDC (PALES SVD simulation
only gave regression of 0.75). I do not have a protocol of refining Da, Rh
using gridsearch as described by Clores et al in J. Magn. Reson. 133, 216-221
(1998). Could you please advice me where to get this protocol?
I did  comment-out the lines referring to rdcs when using anneal.py without RDC,
somehow the calculation is very slow compared with that using RDC. Maybe I made
a mistake somewhere. I will attach the anneal.py for you to check later since I
am out of town and cannot login to my Linux account.
I appreciate your hepful suggestion!

Happy Easter Holiday!

Best wishes,
Hongyan

Quoting Charles at Schwieters.org:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> Hello Hongyan--
> 
> > The problem for me is to choose which program to refine my protein
> > structures using RDC. Xplor-NIH anneal.py script did gave rise to
> > well-converged structures but there seems no much differences with or
> > without RDC, both in RMSD and structures. However, in Aria, I do see
> > the differences when RDC is used (lower RMSDs and slightly different
> > helical angles). When I used anneal.py to calculate structures without
> > RDC, I just input a empty rdc.tbl, not sure if
> > it is OK. 
> 
> that should be ok. Better to just comment-out the lines referring to rdcs
> 
> > Since when I added # to those related to tensor, rdc etc, running
> > anneal.py tooks much longer time. I don't konw why.
> 
> not exactly sure what you mean. It does take longer when rdcs are
> included. 
> 
> > 
> > My people did use the method as described by Clore et al to refine Da and
> Rh
> > even if they have an initial structres (since they don't fit well with RDC
> > data). I think the old-verion of Xplor-NIH could not float tensor, how
> > to get a good set of Da and Rh is also important issue.
> 
> anneal.py requires a decent approximation to Da and rhombicity- this can
> be gained by the approach in J. Magn. Reson. 133, 216-221 (1998).
> 
> If you have good starting structures you can use protG/calcTensor.py (or
> protG/grid_search.inp if you want to wait longer) to determine values of
> Da and Rh. Otherwise, please use the above reference. Once you have a
> good initial guess at Da, Rh, anneal.py and refine.py can fine tune
> things.
> 
> hope this helps--
> Charles
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
> 
> iD8DBQFGE5IkPK2zrJwS/lYRAk/rAJ9ZS9NpD5bh58caM9b6uCbTmX6g9gCfe7Sy
> 7RwxFZQ3CrvqGGobnxZ9GSU=
> =OU0R
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 


Dr. Hongyan Li
Department of Chemistry
The University of Hong Kong
Pokfulam Road
Hong Kong

Reply via email to