Hi Robert, Try -cutoff instead of -likelihoodCutoff. That should correct the problem.
--JK On May 5, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Robert Schneider wrote: > Dear Xplor developers, > > I have another question regarding a PASD script in Xplor 2.18. After > everything ran as desired now so far, I wanted to try and see what > I get > out of a structure calculation using marvin restraints converted to > xplor if I also include peak assignments with likelihoods lower > than the > standard 0.9. So I re-ran convert_restraints_to_xplor.tcl with a lower > cutoff: > > removeLowLikelihoodPeakAssignments \ > -pot $3dc625 \ > -likelihoodCutoff 0.5 > > but the xplor_noes file I get out is identical to that produced with > -likelihoodCutoff 0.9. Upon checking quickly, I right away found one > peak that has two assignment possibilities with likelihoods between > 0.5 > and 0.6 and none larger than that (in the final.peaks file), so I > guess > these should show up in the xplor_noes file if likelihoodCutoff 0.5 is > used - but the peak is still listed with a "no assignments for this > peak". Have I missed setting some parameter somewhere else? > > Thanks a lot in advance, best greetings, > --robert. > _______________________________________________ > Xplor-nih mailing list > Xplor-nih at nmr.cit.nih.gov > http://dcb.cit.nih.gov/mailman/listinfo/xplor-nih
