-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Raik--

> Charles at schwieters.org wrote:
> > The default settings for the Python interface are for structure
> > determination calculations- they are not appropriate for realistic MD
> > calculations. Moreover, you will need some description of the solvent to
> > obtain qualitatively realistic results. You will probably want to
> > replace the RAMA term with the DIHE term. You should not want to call
> > massSetup(). 
> 
> our IVM dynamics is, in principal, working now and I am trying to make
> the motions a bit more realistic. Are there any example scripts
> (python or classic) that use IVM for non-restrained dynamics (if
> possible with Langevin heat coupling)? I have many scripts with
> param19 based setup for cartesian MD but param19 may not be the best
> parameters for IVM...
> 

Sorry, I really haven't tried to do this sort of calculation. Are you
going to account for the solvent in some way?

best regards--
Charles
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAkpg4w8ACgkQPK2zrJwS/lafVwCeKtPYjNPuMNAos3FyNE1VD/K0
tJAAnR0CTmXeUx/bkGB7A8wzxHLU/6Ru
=sGpc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to