-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hello Maria--

> I'm refining an RNA hairpin structure with xplor, using parameter file 
> nucleic.par. When uploading my final structures to the RCSB validation 
> server I notice that many angles and bond lengths do not cluster about 
> the mean values given in Clowney et al., JACS 1996, 118, 509-518, but 
> lie up to 2?/0.02A away from them. This is due to angles/bonds that are 
> defined by the same term in  nucleic.par but do differ a little in 
> reality, e.g. Guanine C2-N3 should be 1.323A, Adenine C6-N1 should be 
> 1.351A and they are both set to 1.339A in nucleic par.
> I do realize that all of these deviating values are well within the 
> 5?/0.05A limits but am just wondering if it is ok for the structures to 
> have all angles/bonds of one type shifted systematically by 2?/0.02A. I 
> noticed that I do not have this issue with cns, which defines every one 
> of these angles/bonds separately.

Three bonds in three bases C2-N3 in GUA, C6-N1 in ADE and N3-C4 in CYT
share the same value, and it seems that this bond length value dates
from 1984, or earlier. I would welcome someone updating these values,
but note that this will probably require that chemical types for those
atoms be changed.

best regards--
Charles
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.9 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAkvrAygACgkQPK2zrJwS/lYu8ACZAemserB6IFVdJLm+FRJmKwZ0
NZMAn37XWmot+FmMicqBn3ObJ/fFDi4v
=CD0S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to