Yes this is just a structure calculation. As long as I can keep the
two domains as rigid as possible while at the same time letting them
move relative to one another your suggestion will fix my problems.
Sent from my iPod
On 29 Sep 2010, at 03:49, Charles at Schwieters.org wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hello Bryn--
>
>>
>> I would like to have two separate parts of the shape term or two
>> separate RMSD terms for two independent domains. Can you suggest some
>> syntax for this?
>>
>> I have a single replica simulation and would like to use the shapePot
>> term.
>>
>> The problem is that I am a little confused regarding the syntax.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> I presume that a block like this should work, but how can I specifiy
>> that I want the shape restrained to that of the starting structure?
>>
>
> Let me first understand exactly what you're looking to do: do you wish
> to perform a structure determination holding domain positions rigid? If
> so, it would probably be best to just group domain atoms into regidi
> regions using the IVM's group method. Something like:
> dyn.group('sel for domain 1')
> dyn.group('sel for domain 2')
>
> You can omit sidechains if you wish to allow them to move. Is this close
> to what you want, or is it something else?
>
> best regards--
> Charles
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.9 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkyimxIACgkQPK2zrJwS/lZN8gCdGBkVatcMtvRMmt/0HxITlbL0
> 0zYAnRv5NrW8m6q7pT8iWhkKpNt0L8n1
> =BBMA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
