On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 19:28 +0100, Julien Lafon wrote: > On 1/5/06, Adam Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > For parallelism I'd rather see the Xprint DDX moved under hw and its config > > bits under that: > > > > Does anyone have a compelling case against this? > > If not I'll probably shuffle > > this around sometime this weekend. > > It does not sound not logical to me - Xprint DDX is no physical > hardware so why should it be tagged as such? >
Maybe "hw" could be renamed to "ddx"? That'd parallelise against the existing dix directory. Drew (I don't have strong opinions either way, so long as I don't have to redo the Xprint patch I just submitted :) ) _______________________________________________ Xprint mailing list [email protected] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/xprint
