Yes, Lion's libX11 uses xcb as the transport layer rather than xtrans. On Jul 22, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Scott Buchanan wrote:
> Thanks. > > Seems like the right direction. I'll look at recompiling Xview on Lion and > see. Since this all worked fine on Snow Leopard do you know of anything in > particular that changed in X11 between the two that might expose this? I was > using plain-vanilla X11, as shipped on Snow Leopard. > > Thanks, > Scott > > On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/2010-July/006259.html >> >> On Jul 22, 2011, at 7:53 AM, Scott Buchanan wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to update an internal legacy project for X11 on Lion. I've >>> updated the project for a few additional compiler restrictions and also >>> some pointer length issues and everything is re-compiling but now I'm >>> getting this error >>> >>> Assertion failed: (ret != inval_id), function _XAllocID, file xcb_io.c, >>> line 470. >>> >>> and I'm really stumped. >>> >>> Any hints appreciated. It is an Xview based project and I haven't >>> recompiled that yet (I updated Xview for Leopard a while ago) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Scott Buchanan >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xquartz-dev mailing list >>> Xquartz-dev@lists.macosforge.org >>> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xquartz-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xquartz-dev mailing list >> Xquartz-dev@lists.macosforge.org >> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xquartz-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Xquartz-dev mailing list > Xquartz-dev@lists.macosforge.org > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xquartz-dev _______________________________________________ Xquartz-dev mailing list Xquartz-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xquartz-dev