Yes, Lion's libX11 uses xcb as the transport layer rather than xtrans.

On Jul 22, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Scott Buchanan wrote:

> Thanks.
> 
> Seems like the right direction.  I'll look at recompiling Xview on Lion and 
> see.  Since this all worked fine on Snow Leopard do you know of anything in 
> particular that changed in X11 between the two that might expose this?  I was 
> using plain-vanilla X11, as shipped on Snow Leopard.
> 
> Thanks,
> Scott
> 
> On Jul 22, 2011, at 10:21 AM, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> 
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xcb/2010-July/006259.html
>> 
>> On Jul 22, 2011, at 7:53 AM, Scott Buchanan wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I'm trying to update an internal legacy project for X11 on Lion.  I've 
>>> updated the project for a few additional compiler restrictions and also 
>>> some pointer length issues and everything is re-compiling but now I'm 
>>> getting this error
>>> 
>>> Assertion failed: (ret != inval_id), function _XAllocID, file xcb_io.c, 
>>> line 470.
>>> 
>>> and I'm really stumped.   
>>> 
>>> Any hints appreciated.  It is an Xview based project and I haven't 
>>> recompiled that yet (I updated Xview for Leopard a while ago)
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Scott Buchanan
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xquartz-dev mailing list
>>> Xquartz-dev@lists.macosforge.org
>>> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xquartz-dev
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xquartz-dev mailing list
>> Xquartz-dev@lists.macosforge.org
>> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xquartz-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xquartz-dev mailing list
> Xquartz-dev@lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xquartz-dev


_______________________________________________
Xquartz-dev mailing list
Xquartz-dev@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/xquartz-dev

Reply via email to