On 2005-02-22 12:40:56 +0100, Roel Vanhout wrote: > Vincent Lefevre wrote: > >This is not cheating, this is exactly what you want to do: create > >a processing-instruction, right? > > Well I want to create a php tag, and php tags just happen to look > like processing instructions, so that's why I'd consider it > cheating. But you're right, it depends on how you look at it :)
They don't just look like. They exactly *are* processing instructions. > I think it has something to do with the fact that the output format > is html; if I try to change the <root> element in your example to > <html>, I get the following output: > > C:\>xsltproc pitext.xsl pitest.xml > <html><?php > $var = 0; > ></html> Yes, ditto here. To get the XML behavior, one needs <xsl:output method="xml"/> xsltproc probably defaults to html output when the root element of the output is "html". I don't know what SGML PI's look like, so I don't know if this is a bug or not. You can still specify the ending "?" in your stylesheet, as Daniel said. > >BTW, this is much cleaner than the solution based on escaping > >(proposed by Daniel), IMHO. Disabling escaping is evil. > > Well at this point I'm just trying to get a working solution, that's > all :) Thanks anyway for guiding me on the way to Enlightenment ;) The advantage of avoiding output escaping is that the stylesheet is more maintainable and there is more guarantee that the output is well-formed. -- Vincent Lef�vre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA _______________________________________________ xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
