On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:48:49PM -0700, Rush Manbert wrote: > I tried your example, using the attached files, against xsltproc built > with libxml2-2.6.19 and libxslt-1.1.14 and I cannot reproduce the error.
I'm not sure I understand, is the problem fixed in the latest version. > Just as a check, my xsltproc --version now tells me: > Using libxml 20619, libxslt 10114 and libexslt 812 > xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20619, libxslt 10114 and libexslt 812 > libxslt 10114 was compiled against libxml 20619 > libexslt 812 was compiled against libxml 20619 that looks normal. > I'm happy to submit a bug if that's the next step, but will need a > little guidance. Is there a link to some documentation? launching xsltproc without arguments or --help ends up with this notice: Project libxslt home page: http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ To report bugs and get help: http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/bugs.html that's the documentation about submitting bugs. But we don't backport bugfixes, i.e. if it works with the latest version the bug will be flagged as FIXED. > In general, should I have attached the files when I posted to the list, > rather than copying inline? (That's what I'd rather do, and it is what > Mark did, so I'm guessing the answer is "yes".) attachments please. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
