On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 12:36:05PM +0100, Tony Marston wrote: > Which interpretation is correct? Which interpretation is the most logical?
This list is not the best resource to ask for grey areas in the XSLT-1.0 spec. For XSLT-2.0 it's simply not implemented in libxslt. http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/bugs.html "If you need help with the XSLT language itself, here are a number of useful resources: * I strongly suggest to subscribe to XSL-list, check the XSL-list archives * The XSL FAQ. * The tutorial written by Paul Grosso and Norman Walsh is a very good on-line introdution to the language. * The only Zvon XSLT tutorial details a lot of constructs with examples. * Jeni Tennison's XSLT pages provide links to a lot of answers * the Gallery of XSLT Tricks provides non-standard use case of XSLT * And I suggest to buy Michael Kay "XSLT Programmer's Reference" book published by Wrox if you plan to work seriously with XSLT in the future. " Those recommendations still apply, the original page on-line has all the links lost in my copy to this mail, please read and follow, > Which interpretation is easiest to implement? That's a very wrong question to ask ! thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
