Phil Shafer wrote:
> When we exposed our XSLT scripting ability to customers, we found them
> quite hostile to xslt syntax. I looked around for alternatives, but
I have the same experience.
> I'd love to contribute this code back to the libxslt sources, if
> you are interested.
I think that SLAX is brilliant. I really like the idea of syntactic
sugar-coating the XML syntax.
Ultimately this is Daniel's decision, but I certainly recommend that it
is included, partly because SLAX is going to be a productivity boost to
stylesheet developers, and partly because SLAX will give libxml a
competitive edge (at least for a while).
I have only browsed through the documentation, but I have a few
suggestions.
> ** The "mode" Statement
> match * {
> mode "one";
> <one> .;
> }
The "mode" looks odd inside the block. How about something like this?
match * with mode "one" {
<one> .;
}
> ** The "priority" Statement
> match * {
> priority 10;
> <output> .;
> }
Same comment as for the mode statement.
match * with priority 10 {
<output> .;
}
> ** The "ns" Statement
> ns junos = "http://www.juniper.net/junos/";;
Consider calling this "namespace" (as used in C++).
_______________________________________________
xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
