>I'll probably be doing a simi-formal one as part of Interpreter; Uli will
>no doubt demand it as part of the "documentation."
Anthony,
yup, we'll need one. Though everyone who adds a command will have to
update it. But of course, what you add, you best document (and just a note:
you might want to start documenting now, then it won't be so much to do
later).
>I think we'll probably wind up with something fairly informal. OpenCard's
>goal isen't to be some backwater wow-that's-nice project.
>We're writing an OpenSource engine, and when hundreds of people start
>wanting to add to Interpreter, we're going to need standardization.
Most importantly, we need documentation. I think something along the lines
of the help stacks that ship with most products unified into one bug stack
or web site might do the trick.
>But I don't think we're about to -- or will ever -- go to the ISO.
... oh, dreams ...
Cheers,
-- M. Uli Kusterer
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.weblayout.com/witness
'The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...'
--- HELP SAVE HYPERCARD: ---
Details at: http://www.hyperactivesw.com/SaveHC.html
Sign: http://www.giguere.uqam.ca/petition/hcpetition.html
