"Daniel 'NebuchadnezzaR' Dehennin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, what we may need is to list changed .el files (newer than their > .elc if exists), if this result is nil we don't need to regenerate > autoloads. I suppose there's already something similar for the compilation indeed. > If not we get reverse dependencies of thoses files, deleting their > .elc and byte-compiling them. > > Does it sound good to you ? Seems OK, yes. -- Matthieu _______________________________________________ Xtla-el-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xtla-el-dev
