> >> > We should rename xtla-\(.+\)\.el to tla(match-string 1).el
> >>
> >> That's not very satisfying either, since you'd have baz related code
> >> in tla*.el files.
> >>
> >> Let's say that xtla*.el is a common library this is used by tla-dvc.el
> >> and baz-dvc.el which provide the DVC backends.
> >
> > Great idea.
> >
> > Here I summarize:
> >
> > Put tla and baz backend common code into xtla*.el. About *, I will try to
> > decide.
> > The non-common xtla*.el code will move to tla*.el.
>
> Fine with me.
I've rename almost all xtla-*.el to tla-*.el.
Exceptions are:
xtla-baz is renamed to baz.el.
xtla-tests will be renamed to dvc-tests.el.
Retrieving tla and baz common code from baz.el and tla-*.el will take much
more time. In the future, file dependencies will be like:
xtla.el <- baz-core.el <- baz.el
<- tla-core.el
