> > Be care. This is very big change. > > If you have strong objection, tell me here. > > I have no _strong_ objection, but this is not what had been decided in > the thread "file name" a few days ago. > > You should not spend too much time on Xtla itself. Well, at least, my > goal is to avoid breaking Xtla during the DVC development, but my > priority is clearly on new RCS like bzr, hg, and others.
I will not take much time to take xtla*.el, common code between tla and baz. However, I'm still using tla and baz on some projects including dvc itself. tla and baz part is too buggy than xtla-1.2.
