This is an automated notification sent by Gna!.
It relates to:
                bugs #1832, project xtla.el



==============================================================================
LATEST MODIFICATIONS of bugs #1832:
==============================================================================

Posted by:              Masatake YAMATO <jet>
Posted on:              Sat 11/06/04 at 03:04 (GMT)

------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
The original code used tla--run-tla-async.

However, my patch uses tla--run-tla-sync to return the result.

Is there any strong requirement to use async function?

(I cannot find any advantage about using async function.)

If not, my patch closes this bug.





==============================================================================
OVERVIEW of bugs #1832:
==============================================================================

URL:
  <http://gna.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=1832>

Project:                xtla.el
Submitted by:           Masatake YAMATO
Submitted on:           Fri 11/05/04 at 14:27

Category:               any
Priority:               1 - Later
Resolution:             None
Assigned to:            None
Originator Email:               
Status:         Open
Planned Release:                0.9
Type of request:                small bug
Merge available:                No
merge request:          
Fixed Release:          
Test case in xtla-tests.el:             


Summary:                Async running of tla-start-project
_______________________________________________________

Original Submission:
'tla import' in tla-start-project is run synchronously.

However, tla-start-project also should return new version name and location. 
Both requirement should be satisfied.



See [EMAIL PROTECTED]




_______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comments:


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 11/06/04 at 03:04         By: Masatake YAMATO <jet>
The original code used tla--run-tla-async.

However, my patch uses tla--run-tla-sync to return the result.

Is there any strong requirement to use async function?

(I cannot find any advantage about using async function.)

If not, my patch closes this bug.



-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 11/06/04 at 00:17         By: Matthieu MOY <moy>
I don't understand where the "bug" is.



Your patch seems to do what you describe. Can we close the bug?



Thanks,

  Matthieu.










==============================================================================

This item URL is:
  <http://gna.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=1832>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


Reply via email to