OK, thanks for the explanations. Steve Youngs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Therefore, I strongly suggest that you revert your "fix" and replay my > patch-4. Almost what I've done. I just renamed xtlahack.el to xtla-build.el. See [EMAIL PROTECTED] for what I've done, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the integration in the mainline. Sorry for loosing some of your time, but the current lisp/Makefile.in seems to me already overcomplicated for what it does, so I don't like adding more stuff to the build system if I don't really understand what it does and why it's there. > > 'Hope everybody's happy now ;-) Once more! > Nearly. :-) I'm looking forward to getting the build in shape so I > can start fixing real problems in the code. And when xtla is running > well enough on XEmacs I want to talk to you about having it included > as an "official" XEmacs package. :-) Great! The current XEmacs maintainer for Xtla (Robert Widhopf-Fenk) is not very active on Xtla currently, it's great to have someone else working on this. > BTW, there's no need to Cc me on anything to this list, I'm > subscribed. :-) No need to tell me that, you already told my Gnus in your headers ;-) -- Matthieu
