Robert Widhopf-Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I am sure you have seen them yourself:
>
> Summary: Merged from Matthieu (patch11-475)

https://gna.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=828

;-)

> which is very miss leading, probably it should be more like
>
> Summary: Merged from Matthieu-main (patch471-475), Matthieu-devo(11-19)

This should already be the case if you define different nicknames for
different branches actually.

> Summary: Merged from Matthieu (patch471-475)

Yes, but that's very hard to do if the message is generated at commit
time. I'd like the log message to be generated in tla-star-merge, so
that the summary includes only the patches that have directly been
merged. This would give the summary you expect.

> But this makes them long again, do you have any better ideas ...

I'd like something customizable here.

Since I started the "main" branch, I'm trying to put a subject on the
summary line like:

patch-473
    Tip of the day [Matthieu (patch15-16)]

I have to do part of the job myself :-( and I think this is very
important for the mainline, because otherwise, "tla logs -s" would
give only the names of the contributors :-((.

The customization should be an alist 
((version . function-generating-the-summary-line)) so that I can use a
différent one for my personnal development branch and for the
mainline.

--
Matthieu

Reply via email to