On Saturday, October 9, 2004 at 23:24:40, Matthieu Moy wrote: > Hi all ! > > There are a few pending issues on which I'd like your opinion > (anyone reading this list, not only developers) : > > 1) Shortcuts in tla-inventory and tla-tree-lint : > > Currently, lots of keybindings applying to a single file (eg `r' > in inventory mode) will use `read-file-name' to ask the user the > name of the file on which the command should be applied, with a > default on the file under point. In a recent discussion[1], > Robert pointed out some disadvantages about this, and suggested a > simpler 'Yes/No' confirmation. > > I like the current approach, because this allows me to delete a > file by putting the cursor on it or by typing its name with one > single shortcut.
So you actually use it to delete another file by changing the name, i.e. you do not delete the file under the cursor? Could you give me an example when you use it this way? > The main disadvantage is that it's inconsistent with dired's > keybindings. > > I'm not opposed to changing this, but for _my_ personnal use, I > prefer the code as it is now. I'd like more opinions on this. I > want the best compromise for the majority of users. > > 2) bug #781 overview: Viewing an change set for an base-0 revision > which is an initial import causes an error. > > I think the error message given by tla is explicit enough, and it > would be really hard to fix. I'd like another opinion before > closing the bug. AFAIK I filed this bug, as I expected a message like A file1 A file2 ... Hmm, its not a xtla problem, its tla which confused me ... Robert
