Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi again ! > > I think xtla now has all the important feature one could expect from a > tla front-end. > > Support of spaces in filenames (tla 1.2.1 and higher) is being > implemented. A few other things are still in the TODO list planned for > the 1.0, but I actually think they can wait (about menus and mouse > operations, xtla's still not perfect, but is already at an acceptable > level). Tell me if some points seem urgent to you. > > Otherwise, I plan to release the 0.9 version in a few days. This is > supposed to be a version with enough features, and not too many bugs > (actually, no real known bug). However, this version is clearly not > tested enough, and does not deserve a 1.0 version number. > > This is the beginning of a feature freeze phase. During this phase, > only bugfixes, testcases, and really minor features will be accepted > in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please ask if you > whish to open a development branch in addition to this one. (with > maybe another maintainer) > > I'll use the xtla download page so distribute the tarball for numbered > versions. Depending on the number of bugfixes and the time taken to > get xtla-test.el at an acceptable level, we may need several 0.9.x > versions, or go directly to the 1.0.
Matthieu, thanks for investing that much time to improve xtla. And also thanks for the efforts to get a 0.9 release out! > Open question: What should be the version number strategy after the > 1.0? I suggest the following: 1.0.1, 1.0.2,... : bug fixes in the stable branch 1.1 : a new development branch 1.2 : the next release and so on. Stefan.
