Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How do you think implement tla--with-current-buffer-maybe? > > tla--with-current-buffer-maybe will be expaned to: > > (when (buffer-live-p ,(current-buffer)) > (with-current-buffer ,(current-buffer) > ...))
I considered the same thing :o) My only concern is that this sort of nondeterminism isn't all that helpful to people writing process handlers. I mean, having something in the docs like "your process handler *might* be executed in the buffer the process was called from" would mean that the caller would still have to check which buffer they were in. I can't really think of a sensible default buffer... maybe we shouldn't encourage people to assume their handler will be executed in any particular buffer. Any ideas? Mark -- Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
