> I think that we already have a working interface for tla. We can add > an additional interface that uses tree-widget.el > We can provide both interfaces for some time. When things have settled > down we can still decide, if we should switch to a tree-widget.el only > solution.
I will provide the archive browser based on tree-widget.el in a separate file(xtla-abrowse.el?) at the early stage of development. In the early stage, I assume tree-widget.el is available on the user's system. The strongest advantage using tree-widget.el is that the buffers for archive/category/branch/version/revision are merged into one buffer. Masatake
