Matthieu Moy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Robert Widhopf-Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Thursday, May 27, 2004 at 17:18:09, Matthieu Moy wrote: >> [...] >>> 3) Inspired by 2) : What should we do to reject a patch? The trivial >>> approach is to merge the patch, revert it manually, and commit, >> >> And then the patch will not be in the missing list anymore, >> how could we omit it from the list with the approaches below? > > I'm not an expert, but something like > > * merging to the previous patch > > * tla sync-tree to include the patchlog of the patch to be rejected
I'm even less of an expert than you, but this is the approach I've always taken. I guess the only issue is that the patch still shows up in your logs as having been applied (doesn't it?). Cheers, Mark -- Mark Triggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
