-Adam
On 11/8/06, Cody Somerville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The alternative cd works fine. The live cd is the issue here. :)On 11/8/06, Adam Miller < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Again, you are referencing the Live cd, I want to know about the Alternate installation cd and success with it under lesser memory footprints under Edgy.
Precision is a fluid concept in a situation like this ... anything to the closest multiple of 32 or 64 would suffice.
-Adam--On 11/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 写于 2006-11-08 07:14:17:
> Anyone with a test system able the check the lowest available specs
> for the alternate installation is? I'm just personally curious and
> lack the hardware. (actually plan to purchase one off ebay over the
> next month just to do testing on feisty with) Thanks.
>
> -Adam
How acurate do you want? Does it make any sense indicating something like
"it require 134M memory" while nobody will have a computer with 134M
memory?
I'd tested it with my computer having 160M (128M+32M) and the Xubuntu live
cd works. (In fact, the 160M even works with Kubuntu live cd afaik). Will
anybody having a computer with memory between 128M and 160M?
So the thing may be: 128M with regression, with 160M it simply works.
--
Sincerely, Pan, Shi Zhu. ext: 2606
--
xubuntu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
-=:Max:=-
--OpenPGP key: 5DBFA065--
--
xubuntu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
--Firefox ( www.getfirefox.com) -- A browser you can trust
--
xubuntu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
--
-=:Max:=-
--OpenPGP key: 5DBFA065--
-- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
