I think they look great now :D On 12/22/06, jmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/21/06, Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 12/21/06, jmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/21/06, Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 12/21/06, jmak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 12/21/06, Vincent < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > They look very cool, just too bad the logo is plain again, I liked > the > > > > > glossy one... > > > > > > > > > > > > > The logo was kept simple intentionally to contrast with the text part; > > > > the opposite how it was with edgy; there the logo image was glossified > > > > the text part was simplified. > > > > > > Why does it have to contrast with the text? Is there some usability > > > reasoning behind that or do you just like it? > > > > > > > Normally, there must be a hierarchy behind the various compositional > > elements. If visually everything is on the same level, it becomes > > confusing. This is just a basic compositional principle. > > Ah, right. But can't the logo and name be looked at as one? > I gave a second thought to the matter and I replaced all artworks with the glossy logo. The text and the image have enough contrast, in term of colors so they still function well. -- 2007 Calendar, Great Xmas gift http://www.lulu.com/content/512622 http://jozmak.googlepages.com/ -- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
-- Vincent
-- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
