Jani Monoses kirjoitti: >> That depends. Can you find a well designed, high quality app for every >> common task, or do you just hope they'll pop up if you keep rejecting >> all those you deem not worthy? I'd rather use a lesser piece of software > > many times no app is better than a not worthy app. The latter can cause more > negative > imporessions. The same reasoning is behind seriously considering dropping > xfburn for gutsy. > > Jani
Please do not quote incomplete sentences when it so obviously distorts the intent of the original writer. The sentence continues: "...that is stable and does it's job well enough". In the case of xfburn I'd have to agree that it's still lacking in both stability and features to be considered worthy of inclusion. Too bad Brasero has such a lengthy list of (GNOME) dependencies... The point of the quoted mail was that a distro with a small developer base shouldn't be overtly picky. It's a bit hard to convince users/clients to migrate to a particular distro if it doesn't even provide the expected basic functionality (whatever that is), no matter how well designed the apps it does include. I'm not implying any of this has been a particular problem for Xubuntu, I just wrote in answer to Mr. Corbier's comments. - Jari -- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
