Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:39:44PM +0100: > On 11/02/2008, Jani Monoses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > That'd be my typing. I know Xubuntu is not supported by Canonical, but > > > it does receive security updates for a longer period. So, does that mean > > > Xubuntu is an LTS and the text on xubuntu.org <http://xubuntu.org> is > > > correct, or should I update the website? > > > > In practice I do not think there have been more than a handful of > > updates to Xubuntu apps which are not in Ubuntu, so I think it is > > misleading to call it LTS. We do not guarantee that we fix Xfce, > > Gnumeric, Abiword or other packages issues. It is usually better > > supported than a regular release since base system and apps where most > > security issues are found are taken care of. > > > > We may need a better explanation but I think LTS implies Canonical paid > > support is valid for the same period (someone needs to check) and that > > is definitely not the case for Xubuntu yet. > > OK, does anyone have any suggestions for a better term than "LTS" to use for > Xubuntu?
"Based on Ubuntu LTS" maybe? -- Radomir `The Sheep' Dopieralski <http://sheep.art.pl> -- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
