> For this release, you are right Jani. But imho, Xfce4's default > burner(the one developed by the same community) is Xfburn. Brasero was
It does not matter what the 'default for Xfce' is. I think we have been through this discussion twice in the past 6 months. We pick what is best for the user. > perhaps chosen because it serves better at the moment. But an Xfce based > desktop should have "some" bias towards xfce tools. Not doing so is No it should not have any bias. It should be about usability (features, performance, ease of use etc) not where that app originated from. Brasero is goo on all these -a dn getting better. Xfburn is not. > something in parallel to giving evince instead of kpdf on kubuntu just > because evince serves better. Maybe I am wrong. But this is my opinion. evince in KDE would be a lot weirder, it's a whole different look and dependency chain, and besides kpdf or okular or whatever kde has are good document viewers In contrast, Xfce alternatives to GNOME apps usually suck. The core desktop is the only one that is worth keeping because of it's maturity and relative lighness. And even there, is stagnation unfortunately with GNOME core closing the gap on the performance front. Jani -- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
