Hi Eddy, Thanks for taking the time to write this up. I always enjoyed reading them. :)
Please see below for inline comments. On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Eddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is only a surface skim. I'll try to dig more once I have some > time to really lay into it at home. > > -Usplash still says "Ubuntu" instead of Xubuntu. Cody in IRC said this > was supposed to be fixed. Do we need artwork or does the config need > fixed? Apparently this is a bug in germinate. I've spoken with cjwatson and its getting fixed. :) > > -gpicview replaced Ristretto? What was wrong with Ristretto? (grr... > more gnome creeping in...) How is gpicview anymore "gnome" than Ristretto is? Ristretto dependencies: libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.20.0), libc6 (>= 2.4), libcairo2 (>= 1.5.18), libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.1.1), libdbus-glib-1-2 (>= 0.74), libexif12, libexo-0.3-0 (>= 0.3.4), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.20.1), libthunar-vfs-1-2 (>= 0.9.0), libxfce4util4 (>= 4.4.2), libxfcegui4-4 (>= 4.4.2) gpicview dependencies: libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.20.0), libc6 (>= 2.6.1-1), libcairo2 (>= 1.4.0), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.4.0), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.14.0), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.12.0), libjpeg62, libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.19.0), libx11-6, libxcomposite1 (>= 1:0.3-1), libxcursor1 (>> 1.1.2), libxdamage1 (>= 1:1.1), libxext6, libxfixes3 (>= 1:4.0.1), libxi6, libxinerama1, libxrandr2 (>= 2:1.2.0), libxrender1 > > gpicview also has some security bugs which you guys probably already > know about, but I wouldn't want to be too hasty: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495968) > Is the version in *buntu the patched one? Yes. Your link reports bug marked fix in version 0.1.9-2. * http://packages.ubuntu.com/gpicview shows Intrepid at 0.1.9-2.* > > BTWIMHO the gpicview interface looks hauntingly like the default > picture viewer for that other OS... (just sayin') Okay. > > -The new wallpaper looks sweet. Great job [insert artist name here]! I don't think we've changed the wallpaper yet since Hardy. > > -Audacious. Mixed feelings... > I guess I'm just not one for tiny skinnable media players. At least it > doesn't look like a Winamp clone out of the box, I'll look forward to > giving this one a workout. Is there another music player that you think might be a better fit? If so, which one? > > > I'll also post my box specs and some benchmarks and if anybody's > interested or if anyone has suggestions of bugs to look for, let me > know. I'd be very interested. You can see some work I did on it at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/Development/Performance > > -Eddy > > > > > > -- > xubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel > Thanks, -- Cody A.W. Somerville Software Systems Release Engineer Custom Engineering Solutions Group Canonical OEM Services Cell: 506-449-5899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
