On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:00:34 +0100 [email protected] wrote:
> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:53:04 +0200 > From: Giuseppe Torelli <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Inclusion of gpicview: wise choice? > To: Xubuntu Development Discussion <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Charlie Kravetz > <[email protected]> wrote: > > While we do appreciate your comment, did you have an alternative to > > suggest? If the developers did not think gpicview was a good choice, it > > would not be included. However, there is a willingness to look at other > > applications to determine suitability in Xubuntu. > > gqview. I know it's old and not developed anymore but it does its job. > Also if faster than gpicview to display the images. > > Just my two cents, Personally I would vote for inclusion of geeqie, a fork of gqview still in alpha state - even though very stable and a loooot faster and nicer than gqview - also it might be stable until karmic. I have replaced my beloved gqview with it and until now I'm really satisfied. (btw, geeqie alpha3 - that's the most recent version - is already in the ubuntu jaunty repos) -- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
