Robert, As I expected there's a bugreport about this (and it seems a fix was released): https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/claws-mail-extra-plugins/+bug/358608
Regards, Simon On Fri, 15 May 2009 09:53:22 -0400 Robert Freeman-Day <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Simon, > > I just tried Claws and some plugins from the repos and the version of > Claws seems to be newer than the plugins built (Ubu 9.04). Did you run > into that during testing? If this situation is common, unfortunately I > don't think it should be considered as a default client. Looks real > nice so far though! > > Robert > > Simon Steinbeiß wrote: > > Robert Freeman-Day wrote: > >> I will say there is key setup and management for the enigmail plugin > >> (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/Specifications/Karmic/ThunderbirdVsClaws#Encryption). > >> If you go to the OpenPGP menu, you should see an item called "Key > >> Management" and I personally found it quite useful for dipping my toe > >> into GPG. > > > > True, thanks for pointing that out. I even realised that the plugin is in > > the universe > > repositories. Maybe I'll update the comparison. > > > >> That being said, you have convinced me to make another go of Claws. > > > > Then I guess all the work was worth it :) > > > > Michele Mor wrote: > >> since this comparison was made in order to decide which application would > >> be part of > >> Karmic, I think you should have tried Thunderbird 3 (beta). > > > > Well, to be honest I there's no consistent behaviour in Ubuntu as to when > > they > > include a beta release. It's not yet in the Karmic repos and as far as I > > can see > > there's not even a debian-package, only a binary one (which I tested). I > > just don't > > think it's the same to test an early beta release from a binary than to > > test a > > package that has already undergone some testing. > > So in a way I think it would have been less fair to compare Thunderbird 3 > > beta2 with > > Claws stable. > > > > (Btw, what would be the significant changes from version 2 to 3 that you > > think are > > really messing up the comparison?) > > > > Regards, > > Simon > > > > - -- > ________ > > Robert Freeman-Day > > https://launchpad.net/~presgas > GPG Public Key: > http://keyserver.ubuntu.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBA9DF9ED3E4C7D36 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkoNc9EACgkQup357T5MfTZlNwCfSfGp3iwAh8m8+9caHcyhBSIh > /RcAn2x404UmslTSMz7k1YbnJvfQAWXW > =4Tys > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
