-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 07:08:22 -0600 Charlie Kravetz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:27:56 +0300 > Jarno Suni <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I find that too bureaucratic. It is better to communicate in the > > project and let your deeds speak for themselves. I think Xubuntu > > should not be a one man's project, but aim at common interest, ease to > > configure to your personal needs. Less is more. > > > > You find having a leader that can actually make a decision bureaucratic > or you find selecting a leader bureaucratic? > > I fail to see the connection between having a project lead and "one > man's project". There is a huge difference, and they are not the same. > Perhaps I should also have stated that this is not a debate about whether or not to have a project leader, but only a way to pick that leader. The Strategy Document guides the governance of Xubuntu. It already states there will be a project leader. That isn't going to be changed. - -- Charlie Kravetz Linux Registered User Number 425914 [http://counter.li.org/] Never let anyone steal your DREAM. [http://keepingdreams.com] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJORSywAAoJEFNEIRz9dxbAcTkIAJjWOVlq7zjuk6Oe2NHiDmFc 0EELf6qMa1330y+HcSMqTSELbt5igN/2SV6ufrfJrxVGV3flpnK5RE1pkp7tmkvr blOIzWFFHtz/5i58uZguFpqGspO+B5pudjpJNFXmOCUFlIuD7oWc80hAOGVmSUpc NO0xyig61oMGMVtA5pukg+01YURavDfryOYk6m2Jnv0C22H8CFgQTHvxorxZLKup gmTuDVKYQn9smE0UjeqnDJR9xwoIhXGop+J8juji58KzsLTCCtxnEVPfEHa0BXlU v58zTh/4isjjWHSe4nWsI2ifdXdP2lSX9GfW17sjrxngnB3/4ddbO4P6SLEFr+E= =1d6o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
