On 07/07/2012 12:03 AM, Simon Steinbeiß wrote: > On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 23:43:52 +0300 > Pasi Lallinaho <[email protected]> wrote: > >> When testing the 12.04, no regressions were reported really, so there >> shouldn't be anything too critical. Bugs exists anyway though, so there >> will be some... >> >> Pasi > Personally I consider it really bad that we shipped a (random) snapshot of > Abiword. (I know it wasn't decidedly the fault of the Xubuntu team, but we > should've maybe started shouting earlier and louder.) The visual glitches > that couldn't be sorted (LP: #948128) are quite obvious and in my opinion > also critical, because they suggest that the software isn't reliable if it > looks so bad.
While I agree that these visual bugs shouldn't have passed through, I'm not sure if they are really critical – and even if they were considered such, I don't see how that would create a "broken" Abiword. > I think we should strive to ship a more solid version in 12.10, since 3.0 > most likely won't be released in time (and anyway, it doesn't mean bugs like > above are fixed!), I'd suggest going back to the stable 2.8 version. Lionel > tested that recently and it seems to work without many changes (mostly > dropping a lib). Sounds like a plan. > > - Simon Cheers, Pasi -- Pasi Lallinaho (knome) » http://open.knome.fi/ Leader of Shimmer Project and Xubuntu » http://shimmerproject.org/ Graphic artist, webdesigner, Ubuntu member » http://xubuntu.org/ -- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
