Bingo! :) On Dec 2, 2012 5:14 PM, "Pasi Lallinaho" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/02/2012 01:41 PM, Darshak Parikh wrote: > > > > @Pasi, I understand. Yes, I understand that the default apps were > > chosen as default after giving much thought to it. And although it > > wasn't directly apparent at first, I understand that the developers > > have a good reason for including those. And what with the current > > situation of the ISO and all these dependencies, it seems that not > > much can be done in that area besides updations. > > > > But there's one thing that I would seriously love, if it's possible. A > > lightweight alternative to USC. Something like the Lubuntu one. Is it > > feasible? > > > > Regards, > > Darshak > > > > > > I agree USC isn't ideal either, but at the moment, it's working for most > of the new users. (As I said before, advanced users can simply > install/use any package manager they see best fit for them.) > > That has been discussed, and as soon as viable and working alternatives > are around, we'll most probably compare them with USC and consider for > inclusion. > > Pasi > > -- > Pasi Lallinaho (knome) » http://open.knome.fi/ > Leader of Shimmer Project and Xubuntu » http://shimmerproject.org/ > Graphic artist, webdesigner, Ubuntu member » http://xubuntu.org/ > > > -- > xubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel >
-- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
