On 03/18/2016 07:24 PM, Pasi Lallinaho wrote:
Hello documentation zealots,

here's a brief summary of a discussion [1] on the IRC channel today:
- The user and contributor documentation are tracked on the same branch because they have many common assets - The user and contributor documentation are however very different in nature; the former is and needs to be release-specific and the latter is never release-specific

That said, I would like to propose the following:
- While keeping both documentation sources in the same branch, drop contributor documentation from the default build target, thus, not shipping it with the built documentation on the ISO - As a consequence of the above, a slight content change needs to be done for the start page to point to the online documentation (I can take this item) - The contributor documentation can then be changed when needed and docs.xubuntu.org updated with it, without explicitly requiring an upload for the package. - Since the contributor documentation would still be available in the source package, make sure the source has a note pointing to the newest branch in case somebody wants to build the contributor documentation (I can take this item too)

Technically, this is only a slight change and we can fortunately keep on using the current Makefiles and build scripts.

Any comments? Agree or disagree?

Cheers,
Pasi

[1] Starting from http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2016/03/18/%23xubuntu-devel.html#t21:19

I don't understand all that back-end stuff so I can't comment on that, but the concept sounds reasonable. I'd say go for it.

--
xubuntu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel

Reply via email to