On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Mark Ballard <[email protected]> wrote: > I saw that comment. It seemed odd, and not credible. So much so that the > only way to address it without amplifying it into a scurrilous rumour would > be to address it directly with the person who made it. If they were talking > nonsense but that led to a whole thread of people talking elsewhere about > Thunar being canned then what you have is FUD. By seperating it from its > shaky source and amplifying it into a general, open question, you turn it > into FUD. It could do considerable and unecessary harm. > > So sorry if I appear rude. But best be firm with rumours at source and stamp > the cancerous stuff out before it spreads. > > The question of xfce and xubuntu's future more widely is one that is > becoming more pressing since Gnome introduced plugins. But that's another > matter. (Or perhaps it's not?! Mwuah ha ha haah!!!)... and one I have been > meaning to ask about. So I'm glad you brought it up in a roundabout sort of > way. > > mb. > I appreciate that, thank you.
Thunar works great for my needs, and it looks a lot nicer than the alternatives I've seen. Now if I could only find out why my USB drives don't register unless Thunar is running... >;^> Never mind - that's another thread I haven't pursued yet. MR -- xubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-users
