Hello, I've posted the XUL Compact Syntax Study online that explores four non-XML syntax alternatives (that is, C style, Python style, Lisp style, Pascal style) hoping to make the XUL syntax more compact and more accesible to newcomers who mighty shy away from the "complexity" of XML.
More @ http://xul.sourceforge.net/compact.html - Gerald PS: For those following along on xul-talk know it's already old news since I've kicked off a discussion about the alternative non-XML compact syntax styles a couple of days ago.If you want to join the discussion on xul-talk you're more than welcome. The question is: Is XML too hard for mere mortals (e.g Aunt Trudie and Uncle Freddie) and are the alternative non-XML syntax styles any better? Let us know what you think. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ xul-announce mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-announce
