Hello,

  IBM has posted the IBM Forms for Mobile Devices
package on the alphaWorks site.

   What is IBM Forms for Mobile Devices?

   IBM Forms for Mobile Devices is a Java distributed
software solution that, using XForms (a W3C standard
for forms definition), enables pervasive mobile
devices to access and complete business forms. This
solution allows developers to quickly create, deploy,
and use forms-based applications. The software
demonstrates the ability of intermittently connected
mobile devices to access and complete business forms
that are stored locally on the mobile device. The
completed forms are transferred to a server for
additional processing when connectivity is available.

  More @ http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/ifmd

   - Gerald

-----------------------
Gerald Bauer
Rich Client Conference (RichCon) 2005 -
http://richcon.com
XUL News Wire - http://xulnews.com
XUL Alliance - http://xulalliance.org
United XAML - http://unitedxaml.org

______________________________________________________________________ 
Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
xul-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-announce
From jeff Tue Dec 14 10:13:18 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 02:13:18 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:13:18 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx125.postini.com ([64.18.0.39] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Ce9gE-0000P7-00
        for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:13:18 -0800
Received: from source ([62.21.96.16]) (using TLSv1) by exprod5mx125.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:15:55 EST
Received: from localhost
        ([127.0.0.1] helo=vorlon.icpnet.pl ident=mailman)
        by mail.pld-linux.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
        id 1Ce7uS-000283-Vg; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:19:52 +0100
Received: from betanet-to-futuro.betanet.pl
        ([62.233.163.242] helo=mail.betanet.pl ident=exim)
        by mail.pld-linux.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.42)
        id 1Ce7uS-00027r-FY
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:19:52 +0100
Received: from http by mail.betanet.pl with local (Exim 4.41)
        id 1Ce7tC-0002fy-Eo
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:18:35 +0100
Received: from 194.150.100.102
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED]);
        by mail.betanet.pl with HTTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:18:34 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:18:34 +0100 (CET)
From: "Piotr 'ares' Siwicki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PLD: Users list \(Polish\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: Re[5]: problemy z eximem
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "PLD: Users list \(Polish\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "PLD: Users list \(Polish\)" <pld-users-pl.pld-linux.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-users-pl>, 
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.pld-linux.org/pipermail/pld-users-pl>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-users-pl>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-pstn-levels: (S:77.37792/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=2.64


>>>>> $ telnet enpe.pl 80
>>>>> Trying 83.31.222.151.80...
>>>>> telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
>>>>> telnet: no connections result
>

>> http://enpe.pl/log
>

nie sledze tego watku od poczatku, ale dodam swoje zdanie do tego:

powiedz mi prosze skad wziales 80 port jako port exima ?

pozdr

ares

_______________________________________________
pld-users-pl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-users-pl
From jeff Tue Dec 14 10:13:18 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 02:13:18 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:13:18 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx125.postini.com ([64.18.0.39] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Ce9gE-0000P9-00
        for <archive@jab.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:13:18 -0800
Received: from source ([65.61.128.211]) by exprod5mx125.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:15:57 EST
Received: (qmail 80365 invoked by uid 89); 14 Dec 2004 10:22:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 80354 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2004 10:22:03 -0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:15:06 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Using Oracle Procedures with _ByRef_ variables
thread-index: AcThwgFxVimb8Bt/RfGpzDj0myrihwAAJj1A
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Peter_Horsb=F8ll_M=F8ller?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Dec 2004 10:15:07.0101 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[C90BB0D0:01C4E1C5]
Subject: MI-L Using Oracle Procedures with _ByRef_ variables
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,UPPERCASE_25_50 
        autolearn=no version=2.64

Hi,

Still strugling with Oracle...

Now a new wish has popped up, but I'm not sure whether it actual can be =
done.

I have a number of procedures in Oracle, and I would like to use these. =
I guess there is no problem using these if I only send values with them =
and don't expect any values back. But can I in anyway get a value back =
using some kind of _ByRef_ parameter ?

Here is an example of the declaration of such a procedure in Oracle:
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE CMIS_INS_IFE
 (P_ID OUT CMIS_INTERFACE.ID%TYPE
 ,P_PSE_ID IN CMIS_INTERFACE.PSE_ID%TYPE
 ,P_OS_USER IN OUT CMIS_INTERFACE.OS_USER%TYPE
 ,P_ORACLE_USER IN OUT CMIS_INTERFACE.ORACLE_USER%TYPE
 ,P_MACHINE IN OUT CMIS_INTERFACE.MACHINE%TYPE
 ,P_TERMINAL IN OUT CMIS_INTERFACE.TERMINAL%TYPE
 ,P_CALLING_PROGRAM IN CMIS_INTERFACE.CALLING_PROGRAM%TYPE
 ,P_TARGET_PROGRAM IN CMIS_INTERFACE.TARGET_PROGRAM%TYPE
 ,P_RESULT IN CMIS_INTERFACE.RESULT%TYPE
 ,P_COMMENTS IN CMIS_INTERFACE.COMMENTS%TYPE
 )

As you can see the first parameter is defined as OUT and is therefor =
used for giving back a value.

But the normal way of calling these would be using Server_Execute() =
which sends a string to the datbase server to be executed, and I can't =
see how I can send a variable to be filled in this way:

        szCmdStr =3D "begin CMIS.CMIS_INS_IFE"
                        & "(nID"
                        & ",5107"
                        & ",'PEM'"
                        & ",'CMIS'"
                        & ",'PC15137'"
                        & ",'PC15137'"
                        & ",'.NET'"
                        & ",'MapInfow'"
                        & ",NULL"
                        & ",'No comment'); end;"
        Print szCmdStr
        nHstm   =3D Server_Execute(nConnection, szCmdStr)
        Print "nID: " & nID
        Server nHstm Close

When doing so, Oracle - of course - tells me that NID (my variable) not =
has been declared.

Any good idea would be appriciated a lot

TIA,
Peter Horsb=F8ll M=F8ller
GIS Developer
Geographical Information & IT
=20
COWI A/S
Odensevej 95
DK-5260 Odense S.
Denmark
=20
Tel     +45 6311 4900
Direct  +45 6311 4908
Mob     +45 5156 1045
Fax     +45 6311 4949
E-mail  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cowi.dk/gis

---------------------------------------------------------------------
List hosting provided by Directions Magazine | www.directionsmag.com |
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message number: 14544
From jeff Tue Dec 14 10:13:27 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 02:13:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:13:27 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx32.postini.com ([64.18.0.187] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Ce9gN-0000PX-00
        for <archive@jab.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:13:27 -0800
Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx32.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:16:01 PST
Received: (qmail 89668 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 10:14:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "Tomcat Users List" <tomcat-user.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 89605 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 10:14:57 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
        tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from 66-152-11-62.ded.btitelecom.net (HELO cqmail1.commercequest.com) 
(66.152.11.62)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:14:54 -0800
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Tomcat Admin Tool Server::Service Drop Down not Populating (was 
RE: Tomcat Administration Application)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:14:51 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Tomcat Admin Tool Server::Service Drop Down not Populating (was 
RE: Tomcat Administration Application)
Thread-Index: 
AcTe3c1ntIM6Qx/SSv2ocCcfu1KrEgAB5QxQAAO+sUAAATbWkACMJT+wAAUICDAACFHtgAAZPLDw
From: "Kelly, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=2.64

Some other strange/interesting behaviour...

Every time I go to the admin login screen I see the following in the
tomcat log:-
Org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor processMapping
SEVERE: Invalid path / login was requested

And another SEVERE message I've seen in the log is:-
Org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor processMapping
SEVERE: Invalid path /Tomcat Server Administration_files/treeControlTest
was requested.

Looks like maybe somewhere the "Tomcat Server Administration_files" is
not being replaced by my own install directory.

Steve. =20
=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Montz, James C. (James Tower) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 December 2004 22:30
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Tomcat Admin Tool Server::Service Drop Down not Populating (was
RE: Tomcat Administration Application)

Unfortunately, my installation exhibits the same behavior.

Typically, the Service (Catalina) menu option shows a drop down of
configured Hosts, Valves, and Connectors.
Clicking the Drop Down (Magnifying glass?) returns nothing under the
branch.

Going to the Actions Drop Down, and choosing 'Delete Existing..' does
return a list of the configured Services.

Anyone else on List know cause/solution?

My Environments:
Tomcat 5.5.4
Windows 2000 Pro
Windows 2003 Server Standard
Sun J2SE 5.0

-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 12:27 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat Administration Application

James,

Thanks for that. That's done the trick. Dunno why there was not a valid
admin.xml file as there is on the Windows install.

However, I still have a problem. I'd expect to see a tree a bit like
this when I get into the admin application:
Tomcat Server
    Service (Catalina)
        Host (localhost)
            Context (/)
            Context (/admin)
            Context (/manager)=20
            Etc....

But I just see as far down as Service(Catalina).

Any clues.

TIA

Steve.=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Montz, James C. (James Tower) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 December 2004 15:54
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat Administration Application

Bare with me, I usually work with Tomcat 4.5 on Linux. My first stab at
Tomcat 5.5 is on Windows.

Anyway, was looking at the files for the tar.gz release of the admin
tools.

Verify that you do indeed have a conf\Catalina\localhost\admin.xml
(double check file permissions as well) This is what re-maps requests
for /admin to \server\webapps\admin.


To me, it does not appear to have a  proper context path specified?
Is the context mapping assumed?  Based on the name of the file?

If required? Modify conf\Catalina\localhost\admin.xml with a path, like
so;

<Context docBase=3D"${catalina.home}/server/webapps/admin" =
path=3D"/admin"=20
         privileged=3D"true" antiResourceLocking=3D"false"
antiJARLocking=3D"false">
</Context>

This should override the generic page in \webapps\ROOT\admin\


-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 2:52 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat Administration Application

James,

I'm on RedHat Linux V9. Everything (tomcat and the admin package) is
installed in the jakarta-tomcat-5.5.4 directory.=20

Even if I undeploy the admin application and then deploy it specifying
the $CATALINA_HOME/server/webapps/admin directory I still get the same
same message telling me to download and install the separate admin
application.

There must be something (can anyone tell me what?) pointing /admin to
the web page that displays this message.

Steve.

-----Original Message-----
From: Montz, James C. (James Tower) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 December 2004 20:13
To: Tomcat Users List; Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat Administration Application

Did you simply extract the .zip file into your Tomcat 5.5.4 install
directory?

The .zip has a file path of jakarta-tomcat-5.5.4\, but the default
installation directory is Tomcat 5.5\

So if you simply extracted the zip into your install directory, look for
a directory named jakarta-tomcat-5.5.4

Drag & Drop those directory contents to the true tomcat installation
directory.

Perhaps the .zip could be re-packaged and remove the path
jakarta-tomcat-5.5.4 from the archive?
This would allow users to simply unzip admin.zip into their installation
directory.

James

-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 1:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat Administration Application

Wade,

Forgive me but I'm a novice at this stuff. How can I modify the link ?
The context name is 'admin' but when I key in
http://localhost:8080/admin I get the same message telling me to
download and install the separate admin application.

Steve. =20

-----Original Message-----
From: Wade Chandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 December 2004 17:27
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Administration Application

Kelly, Steve wrote:
> I've just installed Tomcat 5.5.4. I also downloaded the separate=20
> Tomcat Administration application. But when I click the Tomcat=20
> Administration button I still get the message saying the web=20
> application is no longer installed by default. From the Tomcat manager

> it says that application 'admin' is running. What else do I need to do
to get into it ?
> =20
> TIA,
> =20
> Steve.
>=20

Well, I assume that first page you are talking about is static, so it
has no idea about the management app.  You could probably find and
modify the link, and the other thing is from your manager application
find the context for the admin app and type in
http://yourservername:yourport/contextname

Wade


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Tue Dec 14 10:15:31 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 02:15:31 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:15:31 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx116.postini.com ([64.18.0.88] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Ce9iN-0000Pu-00
        for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:15:31 -0800
Received: from source ([217.148.182.6]) (using TLSv1) by 
exprod5mx116.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:18:08 EST
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wd03.super-servers.net)
        by wd03.super-servers.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
        id 1Ce9k2-00009r-O2; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:17:14 +0100
Received: from [196.28.61.135] (helo=avas1.coqui.net)
        by wd03.super-servers.net with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ce9k1-000091-Bi
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:17:13 +0100
Received: from D2WLDT31 ([IP=66.50.214.37]) by eSafe SMTP Relay 1102957448;
        Tue Dec 14 06:20:38 2004
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 06:17:01 -0400
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Mailer: IncrediMail (2501361)
From: "Jose A. Izquierdo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-FID: PLAINTXT-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-ESAFE-STATUS: Mail clean
X-ESAFE-DETAILS: Clean
Cc: 
Subject: [OGD] A small request to de friends debating Evolution Vs
        Creationism
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "the OrchidGuide Digest \(OGD\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "the OrchidGuide Digest \(OGD\)"
        <orchids_orchidguide.com.orchidguide.com>
List-Unsubscribe: 
<http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: </pipermail/orchids_orchidguide.com>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: 
<http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any 
abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wd03.super-servers.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - mail-archive.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - orchidguide.com
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
X-pstn-levels: (S:97.02038/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=2.64

Please ...if you want to refer to the Supreme Creator of the scriptures
written for the People of the Covenant  use  G-D....  do not  write the full
name: it is sacrilegious.



TIA



José

_______________________________________________
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com
From jeff Tue Dec 14 10:18:11 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 02:18:11 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:18:11 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx86.postini.com ([64.18.0.74] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Ce9kx-0000SA-00
        for <archive@jab.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:18:11 -0800
Received: from source ([146.82.138.6]) by exprod5mx86.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 04:20:49 CST
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
        id 493EC2E2C5; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 04:20:46 -0600 (CST)
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from p15168122.pureserver.info (p15168122.pureserver.info 
[212.227.23.207])
        by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DBC2E1A5
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 04:20:44 
-0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by p15168122.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD1F8001A9
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:44 
+0100 (CET)
Received: from p15168122.pureserver.info ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (p15168122 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 11186-09 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from imap.local.netz (pD956D786.dip.t-dialin.net [217.86.215.134])
        by p15168122.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372FA8001A5
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:43 
+0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by imap.local.netz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682FC81F839D
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:42 
+0100 (CET)
Received: from imap.local.netz ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (sigma [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
        id 07149-08 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rose.local.netz (rose.local.netz [192.168.1.14])
        by imap.local.netz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFD481F8398
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:35 
+0100 (CET)
From: "Roland M. Kruggel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT] Server aufsetzen! Dauer?
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:19:11 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at local.netz
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pureserver.info
X-Rc-Virus: 2004-10-30_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2004-08-29_01
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/116172
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: <debian-user-german.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-german/>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 04:20:46 -0600 (CST)
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0150) gt3 GT2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
Resent-Bcc: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=2.64


> Das mit dem Argument "GAU testen, also RAID HD raus und l=F6schen
> und dann sehen was passiert" ist kein Argument. Dies ist der
> Grund warum wir ein Systemhaus als Betreuung nehmen und es nicht
> selbst machen. Ich gehe einfache davon aus, das wenn DIE es
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> machen, dann muss das gehen.=20

Ist dies Einstellung nicht etwas blau=E4ugig?

Hat das Systemhaus euch die Sicherheit 'gezeigt' oder nur 'gesagt'?=20
Man mu=DF zwar nicht alles selber machen, jedoch sollte man schon=20
=DCberpr=FCfen.

Klar, bei einem GAU haftet das Systemhaus. Aber, kann es Haften?=20
Erstmal ist Stillstand in der Firma. Neues Equitment=20
bestellen/kaufen, installieren, konfigurieren, bis das dann wieder=20
l=E4uft gehen so manche zig-Tausend den Bach runter.


=2D-=20
cu

Roland Kruggel  mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System: Intel 3.2GHz, Debian sid, 2,6.7, KDE 3.3.1
From jeff Tue Dec 14 10:18:12 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 02:18:12 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:18:12 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx5.postini.com ([64.18.0.145] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Ce9ky-0000SJ-00
        for <archive@jab.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:18:12 -0800
Received: from source ([209.237.227.199]) by exprod5mx5.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:20:50 PST
Received: (qmail 4841 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2004 10:20:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: "Lucene Users List" <lucene-user.jakarta.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 4816 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2004 10:20:24 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
        tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from Unknown (HELO ehatchersolutions.com) (69.55.225.129)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:20:19 -0800
Received: by ehatchersolutions.com (Postfix, from userid 504)
        id 641E913E200B; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:20:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] 
(va-chrvlle-cad1-bdgrp1-4b-b-169.chvlva.adelphia.net [68.169.41.169])
        by ehatchersolutions.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CA013E2005
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:19:41 -0500 
(EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Hit 2 has score less than Hit 3
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:19:38 -0500
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.0750) GT3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=2.64


On Dec 14, 2004, at 4:53 AM, Vikas Gupta wrote:
> I have come across a scenario where the hits returned are not sorted.  
> Or
> maybe they are sorted but the explanation is not correct.
>
> Take a look at
> http://cofferdam.cs.utexas.edu:8080/search.jsp? 
> query=space+odyssey&hitsPerPage=10&hitsPerSite=0

This site was down when I tried to access it.

> Look at the top 3 results.
>
> Score of Hit 1 is 1.0188559
> Score of Hit 2 is 0.9934416
> Score of Hit 3 is 1.0188559
>
> I can't explain how score of hit 2 can be < hit 3. I thought the hits  
> that
> were returned were sorted.

Hits should be in descending score order by default.  Are you using the  
new Sort facility at all?  Are you walking through Hits properly (i.e.  
hits.doc(i), i is the i-th hit, not document id i)?   What version of  
Lucene are you using?

Sorry - figured I'd rattle off some standard troubleshooting questions  
:)

> FYI, the docs corresponding to hits 1,2 and 3 have exactly the same
> scoring fields(By scoring fields, I mean the fields used in the query).

Use the IndexSearcher.explain() feature to get the real scoop on why a  
score is computed the way it is.

        Erik


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From jeff Tue Dec 14 10:18:13 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 02:18:13 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:18:13 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx115.postini.com ([64.18.0.87] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Ce9ky-0000SL-00
        for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:18:12 -0800
Received: from source ([212.227.15.69]) by exprod5mx115.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:20:50 PST
Received: from [134.102.123.69] (helo=saturn.genealogy.net)
        by mxeu6.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis),
        id 0MKsUu-1Ce9nW02bg-0003dU; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:50 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by saturn.genealogy.net (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with ESMTP
        id 3E45A23ACEB; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from saturn.genealogy.net ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (saturn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 13988-09; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from saturn.genealogy.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by saturn.genealogy.net (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with ESMTP
        id D649323AA9E; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:28 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by saturn.genealogy.net (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with ESMTP id
        A2ADC23ACEA for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from saturn.genealogy.net ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (saturn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 14033-02 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20])
        by saturn.genealogy.net (Postfix on Linux (i386)) with SMTP id
        8D04E23ACEF for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 20613 invoked by uid 0); 14 Dec 2004 10:20:19 -0000
Received: from 134.102.78.100 by www65.gmx.net with HTTP;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:19 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:20:19 +0100 (MET)
From: "Frank Lubisch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Niederschlesien-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Authenticated: #25394349
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Flags: 0001
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at genealogy.net
Subject: [NSL] Sprottauer Jahrbuch 1929 Personenregister
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.3
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Niederschlesien-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: Familienforschung in Niederschlesien [deutschsprachige,
        offene Liste] <niederschlesien-l.genealogy.net>
List-Unsubscribe: 
<http://list.genealogy.net/mailman/listinfo/niederschlesien-l>, 
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://list.genealogy.net/mailman/private/niederschlesien-l>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://list.genealogy.net/mailman/listinfo/niederschlesien-l>, 
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at genealogy.net
X-pstn-levels: (S:60.29095/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=2.64

Liebe Sprottauforscher und alle anderen Listenmitglieder,

hier nun das Personenregister vom Sprottauer Jahrbuch 1929:

Ambrosch; Anders; Anderssohn; Appenrodt; Assig
Baensch; Becke; Beer; Brauner; Brügmann
Dartsch; Dittmann
Fiedler; Fischer
Gärtner; Gierth; Griesohn; Großmann; Günther
Haschke; Herrmann 2; Hirsch; Hoffmann; Hohberg
Irmler; Irrgang; Iske
Jähncke
Kamerling; Klinner; Knappe; Kolata; Konrad; Kranold; Kreibig; Krug
Lachmann; Lamprecht; Langner; Laube; Lechner; Leppich; Lisband
Maaß; Maetschke; Menzel; Meyer; Michael; Müller 2
Neumann; Nitschmann
Pawelke; Philler; Pohl
Riemer; Rosenau; Rümpler 2
Schindler; Schneider; Schüssel; Schwarz; Selle; Sindermann; Splisgarth;
Stavenhagen; Steinmeister; Stephan
Thiel
Wagenknecht; Wiedemann; Wolff 2
Zauritz 2; Zimmerling


Viele Grüße 

Frank LUBISCH

-- 
NEU +++ DSL Komplett von GMX +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
GMX DSL-Netzanschluss + Tarif zum supergünstigen Komplett-Preis!
_______________________________________________
Niederschlesien-L mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.genealogy.net/mailman/listinfo/niederschlesien-l
From jeff Tue Dec 14 10:18:14 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 02:18:14 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:18:14 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx120.postini.com ([64.18.0.34] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Ce9kz-0000SZ-00
        for <archive@mail-archive.com>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:18:13 -0800
Received: from source ([66.98.138.60]) (using TLSv1) by 
exprod5mx120.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:20:52 EST
Received: from secure1.company-hosting.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by fesim.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBEAElrS009522
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 03:14:47 -0700
X-ClientAddr: 217.12.10.179
Received: from web25707.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25707.mail.ukl.yahoo.com 
[217.12.10.179])
        by secure1.company-hosting.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id 
iBEAEe3f009510
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 03:14:41 -0700
Received: (qmail 6842 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Dec 2004 10:20:37 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [196.25.238.130] by web25707.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 
14 Dec 2004 10:20:37 GMT
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:20:37 +0000 (GMT)
From: daivd kuhmalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1011067886-1103019637=:6508"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-DBHostingEnsim4.1-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more 
information
X-DBHostingEnsim4.1-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: URGENT CONFIDENTAL
X-pstn-levels: (S: 4.68328/99.57351 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:89.0447 C:99.7951 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forward (good recip) [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
        HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE,NIGERIAN_BODY1,RCVD_IN_SBL 
        autolearn=no version=2.64

--0-1011067886-1103019637=:6508
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


Mr. DAVID KUHMALO
Johannesburg Republic
of South Africa.
TEL:27-732-166764
Attention: 



Good day, 

Getting your contact was not an easy task because  since I am not   Computer 
literate, if you rely  solely on God, you will never go wrong, My name is Mr. 
DAVID KUHMALO, the stepson of Mr.DAIVD   TERRY FORD  of Zimbabwe. It might be a 
surprise to you   where I got your contact address; I got it from the   net. 
Don’t be worried because I am contacting you in   good faith.

During the current crisis against the farmers of Zimbabwe by the supporters of 
our President Robert Mugabe to claim all the white owned farms in our country, 
he ordered all the white farmers to surrender  their farms to his party members 
and their followers .My stepfather was one of the best farmers in the country 
and knowing that he did not support the  President political ideology, the 
president supporters invaded my father's farm and burnt down everything, killed 
him and confiscated all his investments.

After the death of my stepfather, my mother and I with my younger sister 
decided to move out of Zimbabwe for the safety of our lives. We took along with 
us the money my step-father kept in the safe in my mother's house which 
amounted to the sum of US$8 MILLION DOLLARS to the Republic of South Africa 
where we have deposited it as personal  valuables in a private Security Company 
for safekeeping.

Because of our present status (Political Refugees), my    mother and I are 
seriously looking forward to having  an overseas partner that will assist us 
with the convenient and legal transfer of the funds out of   South Africa  For 
detailed information, you can contact me on my direct Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
 otherwise  i will not  recieve it.                  
I would appreciate confidentiality and honesty in our  correspondence. our 
immediate response will be highly welcomed.

Best Regards,
MR. DAVID KUHMALO
(for family)









                
---------------------------------
Win a castle  for NYE with your mates and Yahoo! Messenger 
--0-1011067886-1103019637=:6508
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; 
BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<P>Mr. DAVID KUHMALO<BR>Johannesburg Republic<BR>of South 
Africa.<BR>TEL:27-732-166764<BR>Attention: <BR><BR><BR><BR>Good day, 
<BR><BR>Getting your contact was not an easy task because&nbsp; since I am 
not&nbsp;&nbsp; Computer literate, if you rely&nbsp; solely on God, you will 
never go wrong,&nbsp;My name is Mr. DAVID KUHMALO, the stepson of 
Mr.DAIVD&nbsp;&nbsp; TERRY FORD&nbsp; of Zimbabwe. It might be a surprise to 
you&nbsp;&nbsp; where I got your contact address; I got it from the&nbsp;&nbsp; 
net. Don’t be worried because I am contacting you in&nbsp;&nbsp; good 
faith.<BR><BR>During the current crisis against the farmers of&nbsp;Zimbabwe by 
the supporters of our President Robert&nbsp;Mugabe to claim all the white owned 
farms in our&nbsp;country, he ordered all the white farmers to surrender&nbsp; 
their farms to his party members and their followers .My stepfather was one of 
the best farmers in the country and knowing that he did not support the&nbsp; 
President political i!
 deology,
 the president supporters&nbsp;invaded my father's farm and burnt down 
everything,&nbsp;killed him and confiscated all his investments.<BR><BR>After 
the death of my stepfather, my mother and I with&nbsp;my younger sister decided 
to move out of Zimbabwe for&nbsp;the safety of our lives. We took along with us 
the&nbsp;money my step-father kept in the safe in my mother's&nbsp;house which 
amounted to the sum of US$8 MILLION DOLLARS&nbsp;to the Republic of&nbsp;South 
Africa where we have deposited it as personal&nbsp; valuables in a private 
Security Company for&nbsp;safekeeping.<BR><BR>Because of our present status 
(Political Refugees), my&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; mother and I are seriously looking 
forward to having&nbsp;&nbsp;an overseas partner that will assist us with the 
convenient and legal transfer of the funds out of&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;South 
Africa&nbsp; For detailed information, you can contact me on my&nbsp;direct 
Email :<FONT color=#003399><FONT color=#000000>{</FONT><A
 href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A></FONT>)&nbsp; 
otherwise&nbsp; i will not&nbsp; recieve 
it.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR>I
 would appreciate confidentiality and honesty in our&nbsp;&nbsp;correspondence. 
our immediate response will be highly welcomed.<BR><BR>Best Regards,<BR>MR. 
DAVID KUHMALO<BR>(for 
family)<BR></P></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV><p>
                <hr size=1><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, 
sans-serif"><a 
href="http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=28672/*http://www.yahoo.co.uk/popularity";><strong><font
 face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Win a castle</font></strong></a><font 
face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong> 
 for NYE with your mates and Yahoo! Messenger</strong></font><strong><font 
color="#FF9900"> 
</font></strong></font>
--0-1011067886-1103019637=:6508--
From jeff Tue Dec 14 10:18:35 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 02:18:35 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:18:35 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx18.postini.com ([64.18.0.158] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Ce9lL-0000T2-00
        for <archive@jab.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:18:35 -0800
Received: from source ([195.157.96.17]) (using TLSv1) by 
exprod5mx18.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 04:21:12 CST
Received: from localhost.twisted.org.uk ([127.0.0.1] helo=toybox.twisted.org.uk)
        by toybox.twisted.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD)
        id 1Ce9ml-000DCt-II; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:20:05 +0000
Received: from [62.58.50.89] (helo=postbode02.zonnet.nl)
        by toybox.twisted.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD)
        id 1Ce9lk-000DBy-RY
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:19:03 +0000
Received: (qmail 6572 invoked by uid 10); 14 Dec 2004 10:18:30 -0000
Received: (vexira-qq 06566-B605D312 invoked from network) 14 Dec 2004 11:18:30 
+0100
Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.0.3]) ([82.172.27.109])
          (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
          by postbode02.zonnet.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for < >; 14 Dec 2004 10:18:30 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Hans de Goede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Xmame] glxtool.c pointer/int casting patch
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.16; VAE: 6.29.0.4; 
VDF: 6.29.0.14; host: postbode02.zonnet.nl)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: Xmame developers mailing list <xmame.toybox.twisted.org.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/pipermail/xmame/>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:19:07 +0100
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=2.64

For printf its better to use %p (pointer) and not cast at all, although 
I dunno if %p is available everywhere.

This matches my previous post: if possible please really fix the code by 
using pointers instead of what ever integer type happens to match ptrs.

Regards,

Hans



F.J. McCloud wrote:
> It's almost negligible, being a meager printf, but the UNIX
> code has one pointer-int casting.  Suddenly being alot more
> paranoid about compiler warnings I used to ignore, it's good to
> fix it.
> 
> The warning is:
> src/unix/video-drivers/glxtool.c:414: warning: cast from
> pointer to integer of different size
> 
> The patch is simple:
> http://www.anthrofox.org/code/mame/64bitclean/glxtool_patch.txt
> 
> The rest of the pointer/int castings are in the core MAME code.
> I'll look at those as I have time.  Some are similarly trivial
> and others I need to be careful about.
> 
> Stephen Behling
> 
> 
>               
> __________________________________ 
> Do you Yahoo!? 
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xmame mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
> 

_______________________________________________
Xmame mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://toybox.twisted.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/xmame
From jeff Tue Dec 14 10:18:46 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 02:18:46 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:18:46 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx128.postini.com ([64.18.0.42] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Ce9lW-0000S4-00
        for <archive@jab.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:18:46 -0800
Received: from source ([213.244.186.176]) by exprod5mx128.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:20:44 PST
Received: from web25707.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25707.mail.ukl.yahoo.com 
[217.12.10.179])
        by venus.starserver.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id iBEAKhSN068385
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:20:44 GMT
        (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: (qmail 6842 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Dec 2004 10:20:37 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [196.25.238.130] by web25707.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 
14 Dec 2004 10:20:37 GMT
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 10:20:37 +0000 (GMT)
From: daivd kuhmalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: URGENT CONFIDENTAL  
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1011067886-1103019637=:6508"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-pstn-levels: (S: 4.68328/99.57351 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:89.0447 C:99.7951 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> forward (good recip) [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
        HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE,HTML_MESSAGE,NIGERIAN_BODY1,RCVD_IN_SBL 
        autolearn=no version=2.64

--0-1011067886-1103019637=:6508
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


Mr. DAVID KUHMALO
Johannesburg Republic
of South Africa.
TEL:27-732-166764
Attention: 



Good day, 

Getting your contact was not an easy task because  since I am not   Computer 
literate, if you rely  solely on God, you will never go wrong, My name is Mr. 
DAVID KUHMALO, the stepson of Mr.DAIVD   TERRY FORD  of Zimbabwe. It might be a 
surprise to you   where I got your contact address; I got it from the   net. 
Don’t be worried because I am contacting you in   good faith.

During the current crisis against the farmers of Zimbabwe by the supporters of 
our President Robert Mugabe to claim all the white owned farms in our country, 
he ordered all the white farmers to surrender  their farms to his party members 
and their followers .My stepfather was one of the best farmers in the country 
and knowing that he did not support the  President political ideology, the 
president supporters invaded my father's farm and burnt down everything, killed 
him and confiscated all his investments.

After the death of my stepfather, my mother and I with my younger sister 
decided to move out of Zimbabwe for the safety of our lives. We took along with 
us the money my step-father kept in the safe in my mother's house which 
amounted to the sum of US$8 MILLION DOLLARS to the Republic of South Africa 
where we have deposited it as personal  valuables in a private Security Company 
for safekeeping.

Because of our present status (Political Refugees), my    mother and I are 
seriously looking forward to having  an overseas partner that will assist us 
with the convenient and legal transfer of the funds out of   South Africa  For 
detailed information, you can contact me on my direct Email :[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
 otherwise  i will not  recieve it.                  
I would appreciate confidentiality and honesty in our  correspondence. our 
immediate response will be highly welcomed.

Best Regards,
MR. DAVID KUHMALO
(for family)









                
---------------------------------
Win a castle  for NYE with your mates and Yahoo! Messenger 
--0-1011067886-1103019637=:6508
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; 
BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">
<P>Mr. DAVID KUHMALO<BR>Johannesburg Republic<BR>of South 
Africa.<BR>TEL:27-732-166764<BR>Attention: <BR><BR><BR><BR>Good day, 
<BR><BR>Getting your contact was not an easy task because&nbsp; since I am 
not&nbsp;&nbsp; Computer literate, if you rely&nbsp; solely on God, you will 
never go wrong,&nbsp;My name is Mr. DAVID KUHMALO, the stepson of 
Mr.DAIVD&nbsp;&nbsp; TERRY FORD&nbsp; of Zimbabwe. It might be a surprise to 
you&nbsp;&nbsp; where I got your contact address; I got it from the&nbsp;&nbsp; 
net. Don’t be worried because I am contacting you in&nbsp;&nbsp; good 
faith.<BR><BR>During the current crisis against the farmers of&nbsp;Zimbabwe by 
the supporters of our President Robert&nbsp;Mugabe to claim all the white owned 
farms in our&nbsp;country, he ordered all the white farmers to surrender&nbsp; 
their farms to his party members and their followers .My stepfather was one of 
the best farmers in the country and knowing that he did not support the&nbsp; 
President political i!
 deology,
 the president supporters&nbsp;invaded my father's farm and burnt down 
everything,&nbsp;killed him and confiscated all his investments.<BR><BR>After 
the death of my stepfather, my mother and I with&nbsp;my younger sister decided 
to move out of Zimbabwe for&nbsp;the safety of our lives. We took along with us 
the&nbsp;money my step-father kept in the safe in my mother's&nbsp;house which 
amounted to the sum of US$8 MILLION DOLLARS&nbsp;to the Republic of&nbsp;South 
Africa where we have deposited it as personal&nbsp; valuables in a private 
Security Company for&nbsp;safekeeping.<BR><BR>Because of our present status 
(Political Refugees), my&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; mother and I are seriously looking 
forward to having&nbsp;&nbsp;an overseas partner that will assist us with the 
convenient and legal transfer of the funds out of&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;South 
Africa&nbsp; For detailed information, you can contact me on my&nbsp;direct 
Email :<FONT color=#003399><FONT color=#000000>{</FONT><A
 href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A></FONT>)&nbsp; 
otherwise&nbsp; i will not&nbsp; recieve 
it.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<BR>I
 would appreciate confidentiality and honesty in our&nbsp;&nbsp;correspondence. 
our immediate response will be highly welcomed.<BR><BR>Best Regards,<BR>MR. 
DAVID KUHMALO<BR>(for 
family)<BR></P></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV><p>
                <hr size=1><font size="2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, 
sans-serif"><a 
href="http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=28672/*http://www.yahoo.co.uk/popularity";><strong><font
 face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Win a castle</font></strong></a><font 
face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><strong> 
 for NYE with your mates and Yahoo! Messenger</strong></font><strong><font 
color="#FF9900"> 
</font></strong></font>
--0-1011067886-1103019637=:6508--
From jeff Tue Dec 14 10:22:51 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 02:22:51 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:22:51 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx122.postini.com ([64.18.0.36] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Ce9pT-0000Tg-00
        for <archive@jab.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:22:51 -0800
Received: from source ([141.225.11.87]) by exprod5mx122.postini.com 
([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 05:25:29 EST
Received: (qmail 31342 invoked by uid 602); 14 Dec 2004 10:22:58 -0000
Precedence: bulk
X-Archive: encrypt
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 31335 invoked by uid 602); 14 Dec 2004 10:22:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Authentication-Warning: fantomas.inria.fr: lasgoutt set sender to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] using -f
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13x] .o --> $(OBJEXT) in Makefile.am
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:25:22 +0100
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Angus Leeming's message of "Tue,
 14 Dec 2004 09:54:27 +0000")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41BEBF92.000 by Joe's j-chkmail 
(http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)!
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=2.64

>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Angus> This one is truly trivial. Moreover, it doesn't appear to be
Angus> necessary in 1.4.x.

Angus> Ok to apply?

Sure.

JMarc
From jeff Tue Dec 14 10:22:54 2004
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Tue Dec 14 02:22:54 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: archive@jab.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:22:54 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx119.postini.com ([64.18.0.33] helo=psmtp.com)
        by toko.jab.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1Ce9pW-0000Tp-00
        for <archive@jab.org>; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:22:54 -0800
Received: from source ([217.160.180.71]) (using TLSv1) by 
exprod5mx119.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP;
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:25:31 PST
Received: from mail.convergence2.de ([217.160.180.71])
        by mail.convergence2.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
        id 1Ce9r8-0000Fn-VX; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:24:35 +0100
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list directfb-dev); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:24:22 
+0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.convergence.de ([212.227.36.84] helo=email.convergence2.de)
        by mail.convergence2.de with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
        (Exim 4.34)
        id 1Ce9qv-0000Dl-Iu
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:24:21 +0100
Received: from port-212-202-201-108.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.201.108] 
helo=master.zion.home)
        by email.convergence2.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
        id 1Ce9qv-0008P8-7R
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:24:21 +0100
Received: by clanbomber.de
        via sendmail from stdin
        id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.115)
        Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:23:41 +0100 (CET) 
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:23:41 +0100
From: Denis Oliver Kropp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [directfb-dev] Re: S3 Virge specs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Denis Oliver Kropp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Denis Oliver Kropp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-archive-position: 413
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-original-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0
List-Id: directfb-dev <directfb-dev.mail>
X-List-ID: directfb-dev <directfb-dev.mail>
List-subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-owner: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-list: directfb-dev
X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:94.8624 C:98.9754 )
X-pstn-settings: 1 (0.1500:0.1500) gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c 
X-pstn-addresses: from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [294/10] 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on toko.jab.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
        version=2.64

Quoting Ville Syrjälä:
> This link was just posted to dri-devel.
> 
> http://members.shaw.ca/mm99mm/S3_Virge_programming_spec.html
> 
> Grab it while it's hot :)

Thanks ;)

-- 
Best regards,
  Denis Oliver Kropp
 
.------------------------------------------.
| DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics |
| http://www.directfb.org/                 |
"------------------------------------------"

                            Convergence GmbH

Reply via email to