On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Gerald Bauer wrote: > > Ian, you're a dreamer. How is Sun supporting XUL? > Now on to IBM: How is IBM supporting XUL?
Both Sun and IBM are important Mozilla contributors, both in terms of engineering time and funding the Mozilla Foundation. It is unlikely they would be backing Mozilla if they did not think it worth their time and money. IBM in particular recently hired a number of XUL developers to work on Mozilla and other XUL applications. > Ok on to Apple. Just because Apple employs David Hayatt doesn't mean > they support XUL. David is just another Apple employee and hardly can > rock the boat but has to shut up. You also seemed to have missed out on > the fact that Apple choose the XUL-free KHTML code base. I cannot comment on this at this time (I'm under Apple NDA) but let's just say that your analysis of that situation is less than perfect too. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program. Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ xul-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
