Hello,
Thanks to everybody for casting your vote to shed a
light on the ongoing XML UI Language (XUL) naming
debate.
Now on to the poll results:
Q: Do you support Mozilla's claim that XML UI
Language (XUL) is a trademark like Google or Amazon
and not a generic term like RAD, IDE, GUI, DOM or IDL?
Yes. - 73 votes (58%)
No. - 36 votes (29%)
Don't care. Whatever. - 8 votes (6%)
Don't know. I'm not a Lawyer. IMNAL (TM). - 8 votes
(6%)
125 votes total
Q: Do you want to shutdown the XUL Alliance and the
XUL News Wire?
Yes. - 28 votes (29%)
No. - 45 votes (46%)
Don't care. Whatever. - 24 votes (25%)
97 votes total
(Source: Full story @
http://xul.sourceforge.net/post/2004/01/poll_results_is_xml_ui_language_trademarkable.html
)
I invite you to analyze and discuss the poll
results, here on xul-talk.
To get started you might wonna read the comments
posted on the Richmond Post news blog first online @
http://xul.sourceforge.net/post/2004/01/poll_is_xml_ui_language_trademarkable.html
If I may quote Mathew McBride's single voice of
reason in a sea of insanity:
My stance is that as long as the first letter in
whatever-gui-markup-language-mozilla-uses stands for
XML, it should be declared a _generic_ term. I think
Mozilla should put an 'M' for Mozilla to make it
_Mozilla_ XML User Interface Language.
Clearly, the Mozilla die-hards and lawyers forgot
that XML is all about vendor independence. How can a
single vendor claim XML UI Language for itself?
Anyone?
- Gerald
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
xul-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk
