> XAML works for web UIs, of course. As far as I can rember Microsoft show
off a Amazon XAML demo at the Longhorn developer conference last fall in Los
Angeles.

I'll have to investigate that.

The next web browser is not Internet Explorer anymore but Windows Longhorn
itself. 

OK, but that seems like it'll be years before webmasters are going to be
motivated to publish a website targeted to just a single OS.

>Looks like a good choice. Maybe your styling format needs a compact non-XML
syntax alternative? 

Possibly, but I don't really think so.  Ideally, the styles would be defined
by a nice designer UI.

> Again, the standalone browser is dead. In the new world the desktop OS is
the browser.

I think that's, what's the expression, burying the body while it's still
twitching?  Something like that.  Ultimately, yes, I think you are right.
But I think this is a long, long ways away.  

>Well, my worry is that because the next browser is the desktop OS you will
also get DRM (digital right management) e.g. for every XAML "web" page you
can state if anyone is allowed to print it and how much it will cost you, to
cut-and-paste or look at your markup code, to save it, when it expires, and
so on. DRM per se is not evil but when Microsoft controls the desktop
they surely can and will abuse it to nickel and dime you to death, for
example.

Ah, ok.  However, the customer will have an interesting choice, because
unlike taxes, you'll be able to choose sites that don't utilize XAML.
Really, I just don't get the feeling that HTML, DHTML, CSS, etc., is going
to go away anytime soon, regardless of what Microsoft wishes.  There are a
lot of sites out there running on non-MS servers.  What would motivate them
to change to XAML?  Especially if they want to offer their customers a
non-DRM-taxation browsing experience?  I honestly don't think MS could get
away with that, but I may be wrong.

Marc



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver
higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3
_______________________________________________
xul-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk

Reply via email to