Hello,

   For more background about Ian Hickson (who used to
work full-time for Mozilla and now works full-time for
Opera) allow me to quote again from Hixie's Natural
Log:

   Ian writes:

   I might even want to participate in the working
group, since someone will have to look out for the
Opera and Mozilla interests!

   Sadly there does seem to be a growing opinion in
certain circles that the W3C is becoming more and more
out of touch with the Web. In many ways, this makes
sense: the membership has many more server-side people
than client-side people, and most of the client-side
people are plug-in vendors, not browser vendors. (All
the browser vendors present at the meeting were in
favour of variants on the Opera/Mozilla ideas, but
they were easily out-numbered by the non-browser
members.) Since most people consider "the Web" to be
what browsers show, it's only natural for an
organisation of people who are largely not doing Web
browser work to appear to be "out of touch".

  Really it's not that the W3C is out of touch with
the Web, but that the W3C membership is solving
problems that every day Web users don't see. For
example things like CC/PP and SOAP are very much
back-end technologies.

   Any comments? Any thoughts? Is this how we build a
rich internet for everyone? By relentlessly pushing
our own self-interest above all else?

   - Gerald


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: GNOME Foundation
Hackers Unite!  GUADEC: The world's #1 Open Source Desktop Event.
GNOME Users and Developers European Conference, 28-30th June in Norway
http://2004/guadec.org
_______________________________________________
xul-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xul-talk

Reply via email to